LOL coding, easy. If only that were true. I've spent many hours on one site pulling my hair out due to the conflicts and errors and limitations that coding can create but having a blast when you come up with the new things that can be done. I'm not saying that it would be difficult, but it may. Some of our requests sometimes just fall out of the area of capabilities for some usage. Only SH or a team person would be able to say whether this would be conceptually possible, but as a way to convey to everyone that not everything is always possible, I figured I'd bring up that sometimes things are possible, sometimes they are not. It depends on the scripting and coding that they have to work with, whether it can be changed and if it would work if they did change it, and invariably if they can do it, it may not result in the direct result you're wishing for without possibly changing something else. Or it could all go well and not be difficult at all! Who knows. The important thing to remember is that SH does do a lot to try to meet us in the middle for all of our requests and not everything can be possible and not everything can make everyone happy. But if we keep in mind things like coding, scripts, that SH is a business, and so forth that we can use these to shape our requests for certain things, or rather the 'necessary' clause of them being done or how upset we get when they can't be done.
We did have this option before, to select what contests we wanted to show and what ones we did not, but then people requested for better results and better ways to classify things and such. This was the result. So it might be possible, but then would that mean we'd have to go back to what was that caused people to request this? Or would it be possible to keep what we have and add just elements back? See, things can often be a bit difficult and this isn't even being eye-deep in coding